wrote in message
ups.com...
On Mar 3, 8:19 pm, "Steven P. McNicoll"


All legitimate cases look legitimate on first viewing.

Steve, good for you. From the time I first heard about the case
pending by the lady against McDonalds for the hot coffee, I'd always
said it was a legitimate claim, but lots of people said I was wrong.
I guess you, like me and her attorney, would have seen that the lady's
case was legitimate "on first viewing." Since she won it was, by
definition, legitimate. Just think how much time, expense and effort
would have been saved if Judge McNicoll had been on the case and
available "on first viewing" to let everyone know what the outcome
should have been!!

I just wish she'd had a "loser pays" rule to rely on since McDonalds
obviously ignored what was apparant "on first viewing."


All LEGITIMATE cases look legitimate on first viewing. That was not a
legitimate case, the woman's injuries were completely her own fault.