"Jose" wrote in message
t...

... and made money that way. Most prefer to drive 80 mph, but the speed
limit is 55. If it becomes UPS policy to drive 80 to beat the
competition, because that's what their customers want, then does "it's a
highway, you expect people to drive fast" gain traction at the site of the
crash?


No. Care to attempt a proper analogy?



McDonalds took a risk on behalf of some customers to please other
customers. They made money on this. They are therefore responsible for
the consequences.


The product was properly prepared, the container didn't fail, why is
McDonalds responsible for the actions of a customer?

Should GM be held responsible if someone drives a Chevy off a cliff?