A tower-induced go-round
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
oups.com...
Ah, forever the non-radar Class D controller's cop-out. "We only
provide sequencing, not separation."
What makes that a cop-out?
In other words, you THINK you know where we are, and you HOPE we'll
follow your directions, and you PRAY it will all work out, and we had
BETTER follow your instructions (or else!) -- but, oh, shoot, it
*didn't* work out when I directed both of you to land on the same
runway? Dang, sorry about that -- we were only providing sequencing
(not!) -- it was up to YOU to not actually hit each other.
Not me, I've never worked a non-radar tower. I also doubt those that do
think that.
To which I say: Either give the poor sap in the tower radar, or stay
home. Go away. Save our tax money and possibly our lives. Uncontrolled
airports work just fine, thank you very much, and I'll trust my
skills, and the skills of my fellow airmen before I EVER again trust a
guy on the ground with binoculars.
So you'll be driving to AirVenture from now on.
We don't need Class D'oh! faux air traffic "control", anywhere.
I can't see any competent pilot having the problems that you have with Class
D airspace. It's become obvious the problem is you, your skills are just
not up to it. For your own safety and the safety of others you should just
avoid Class D airspace until you upgrade your skills and knowledge.
|