Peter H. Granzeau wrote:

:On Sat, 09 Aug 2003 08:11:18 GMT, Fred J. McCall
wrote:
:
:So the game is to just keep changing the statement when the preceding
:one proves up wrong?
:
:Yeah, that shows a lot of intellectual integrity....
:
:Why was it necessary to take a discussion of facts and turn it into a
:discussion of rhetoric?

Because the other side was being fact free....