A tower-induced go-round
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
wrote in message
...
Yep, those are the IFR procedures.
Which part of the local procedures being for VFR are you having trouble
understanding?
None. What made you think I did? Did you know the local procedures were
for VFR operations before you joined this discussion?
Because you keep bringing up the IFR procedures as though they were
relevant to VFR.
Of course I knew local prodedures are VFR; I've always known that.
The 6 IFR departure would be illegal to do without a radio, and if
you did it with a radio, while legal, it would **** of the class C
tower which is expecting you to use the VFR procedure and call them
when you get close to midfield if you intend to cross their airspace.
Following an IFR procedure would not **** off the tower and I wouldn't be
calling them at all.
One more time, we are talking about following VFR procedures while VFR.
You can't legally fly the IFR departure unless you file IFR and then,
no, you are not talking to the Class C tower, you are talking to the
Class C departure.
Following the IFR procedure while VFR will do a lot more than just
**** off the Class C tower.
Since you don't seem to get it:
We are talking about following VFR procedures while VFR.
We are talking about following VFR procedures while VFR.
We are talking about following VFR procedures while VFR.
We are talking about following VFR procedures while VFR.
We are talking about following VFR procedures while VFR.
We are talking about following VFR procedures while VFR.
We are talking about following VFR procedures while VFR.
We are talking about following VFR procedures while VFR.
We are talking about following VFR procedures while VFR.
--
Jim Pennino
Remove .spam.sux to reply.
|