Mxsmanic wrote:
Ron Natalie writes:

No you are confused. Magnetic SOUTH is the exact opposite of magentic
north you fool. The fact that the MAGNETIC SOUTH POLE is not exactly
opposite the MAGNETIC NORTH POLE is a different issue.

I assumed that others would understand this, but I often get into trouble when
I assume others will understand things.

You expect others to understand things when you blither incorrect
concepts.

The fact that
the poles aren't aligned with the arbitrary "true" datum just means that
the variation equations aren't as simple as they might be.

They are more than just misaligned: they are not at opposite points in terms
of longitude and latitude, either. A line drawn between them does not
intersect the center of the Earth.

Correct, that was my point. It doesn't change anything. Magnetic
south and magnetic north are still opposite directions at any given
point on the earth.

Really, like what?

GPS and inertial reference platforms, VORs, NDBs, you name it.

GPS and INS use elaborate internal computation to determine it, yes.
Haven't ever seen an INS in anything smaller than a transport category.

NDB's chortle..you haven't a clue.
VORs not on your life, unless you're sitting on station.
You should learn something about navigation and geodessy before
you make these bogus statements.


Compasses are still damned reliable compared to
anything else. Cheap too. The only thing that presumes to do better
perhaps is GPS. And it's easier to program that to deal with the
magnetic measurements than to try to force everybody else the other
way.

So how often do you fly using just your magnetic compass alone?

Give me a chart and a compass and I'll do just fine VFR. Managed
to fly the Navion around just fine that way when I had all the
avionics and the gyros pulled out while I was redoing the panl.