"Brash" wrote in message
u...
"L'acrobat" wrote in message
...

"Defender in Tas" wrote in message
m...
That was harsh Mr Acrobat, very harsh. Although you did I "may"
not
know much on the subject, which at least tones down your comment.

You have demonstrated a serious lack of subject knowledge.

Where exactly?


In almost all of your posts, it has been pointed out to you repeatedly.



As for your comments Brash, it might be worth remembering that
at
some point in time if you were an infantry soldier you may be
grateful
for that gate guard and his campaign to save the F-111.


I was in the infantry and the gate guard is an amusement, nothing
more.

I don't wish to defend him because he has been a little less than
polite to me, but I happen to think the role of the airfield defence
guards is a very important one. I know one who served in East Timor
and I wouldn't describe his service as being of less value than anyone
else's.

Serving as guard to an airfield is of less importance than that of the
troops on active combat ops.

Typical comment would expect from a dumb grunt with a head full of the
usual
khaki ****.

Question to you Private (Rtd), if its securing airpower is so unimportant,
why is so much effort (airstrikes, missile attacks, special forces action)
put into destroying airpower?

That you think ADGs only do airfields is further proof of what a clueless
****-for-brains you are.



Poor gate guard, it must suck knowing you are second rate.