"Brash" wrote in message
u...
Oh ****. This is like trying to explain quantum physics to monkeys.
(Actually, I suspect that would be easier).



You aren't very good at this are you?


"L'acrobat" wrote in message
...

"Brash" wrote in message
u...


Actually Infantry is over sucribed, the school of cool is not that
full
these days cause there is only limited postions in the Battalions.
How
often
r the Battalions being deployed? all the bloody time, how often r
the
F111s
being deployed?

Obviously the finer points of Strategy are lost on you. Infantry
battalions
(especially those a "light" as ours) don't make much of a strategic
deterrent. And F111s aren't suited to peace-keeping.


again the gate guard shows his ignorance.

Seeing as I'm not a gate guard, who is being ignorant here?


Poor gate guard, BTW what was it you applied for when you joined the RAAF?,
GD after all, gate guard is as low as it goes.



The size of the Army force in Aus significantly raises the bar as to
what
constitutes an effective invasion force, which consequently raises the
logistic requirements to invade Aust significantly.

That's right, you two-dimensional spastic. Australia's interests aren't
affected unless enemy troops lodge on our shore. I'd expect a lowly
infantry
Private (Rtd) to think in such constrained terms. Clearly, this topic is
way
out of your ability to comprehend.


And how much has the F-111 done to promote Austs interests beyond our shores
in the time since we ordered them? compared to three Inf Bns over the same
time.

But then a gate guard like you has no idea at all have you?


Perhaps if you didn't use words that you don't understand (like
'strategy'),
you would not keep making such a fool of yourself?

Perhaps if you just spared us your "insights" and stuck to what you know
(whatever the **** that is) you wouldn't make a fool of YOURself.


Yawn, perhaps if you stuck to begging other dweebs in binaries NGs to tell
people you are cool and continued to promote assaulting females then you
would simply maintain all of our opinions of you?



Long range strike is a very useful capability for Aust,

Especially when it makes potential aggressor decide not to be aggressive
in
the first place.

You see the problem with that is it's religion, not fact - you can give no
examples of potential aggressors who have been deterred by the F-111, you
just have faith in it.

Wheras in WW2 the Japanese acknowledged that they lacked the ability to move
and supply the amount of troops they would need to invade Aust because of
the Army forces in situ.

Fact V religious belief.

Its little wonder you think the way you do. Its that low
level army training you've been exposed to. Sadly,, a great many army
officers display the same "understanding" until they've done a Joint
Warfare
Course and learn that defending Australia doesn't start at the low-tide
mark.

Poor gate guard, you believe that and thats important, please tell us how
many credible attackers have been deterred by Aust F-111s?


but it doesn't
neccessarily need to be delivered by F-111

The only correct thing you've said all day.

and it is not the be all and end
all of deterrent.

No **** Private (Rtd) L'abortion?


What a sad little dweeb you are.