View Single Post
  #4  
Old August 16th 03, 11:02 AM
Brash
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"L'acrobat" wrote in message
...

"Brash" wrote in message
u...
Oh ****. This is like trying to explain quantum physics to monkeys.
(Actually, I suspect that would be easier).



You aren't very good at this are you?


This is pointless. Just like all the other "discussions" I've had with
dumb**** grunts in boozers and pubs over the years. You're all ****ing
brainwashed and stupid and can't be taught anything after they've finished
programming you at Kapooka and Singelton.

Poor gate guard, BTW what was it you applied for when you joined the

RAAF?,
GD after all, gate guard is as low as it goes.


What's funny about this line you've adopted, is that "gate guards" get paid
more and are better trained than your precious little lot.


And how much has the F-111 done to promote Austs interests beyond our

shores
in the time since we ordered them? compared to three Inf Bns over the same
time.

But then a gate guard like you has no idea at all have you?


I'm not a gate guard dill. It's obvious you have no idea at all.

Perhaps if you just spared us your "insights" and stuck to what you know
(whatever the **** that is) you wouldn't make a fool of YOURself.



Yawn, perhaps if you stuck to begging other dweebs in binaries NGs to tell
people you are cool


What the **** are you on about spastic?

and continued to promote assaulting females then you
would simply maintain all of our opinions of you?


Refresh my memory.

Especially when it makes potential aggressor decide not to be aggressive

in
the first place.


You see the problem with that is it's religion, not fact


And your bull**** about scrapping jets in favour of a few thousand more
dumbass grunts isn't? **** off idiot.

- you can give no
examples of potential aggressors who have been deterred by the F-111, you
just have faith in it.

Wheras in WW2 the Japanese acknowledged that they lacked the ability to

move
and supply the amount of troops they would need to invade Aust because of
the Army forces in situ.

Fact V religious belief.


Listen up dickhead, do the math and tell me how many troops were in the
various arms of the 2nd AIF, the RAAF, the RAN and the militia at the time
and compare that to the 21st Century. See ya later dickhead.


Its little wonder you think the way you do. Its that low
level army training you've been exposed to. Sadly,, a great many army
officers display the same "understanding" until they've done a Joint

Warfare
Course and learn that defending Australia doesn't start at the low-tide
mark.


Poor gate guard, you believe that and thats important, please tell us how
many credible attackers have been deterred by Aust F-111s?


Do you still stick your cock in dogs?



but it doesn't
neccessarily need to be delivered by F-111


The only correct thing you've said all day.

and it is not the be all and end
all of deterrent.


No **** Private (Rtd) L'abortion?


What a sad little dweeb you are.


And this "dweeb" could knock your stupid block off. How embarrassing for
you!

--
De Oppresso Liber.