"M" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Apr 29, 1:46 pm, "Matt Barrow"
wrote:

This is an even better source showing the decline of 100LL
consumption:

http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/a403600001m.htm

Do you understand correlation vs causation?

You're simply arguing without any solid number. Just because you
believe 100LL still has a bright future doesn't mean it's true.

I never said 100LL had a bright future. I figure inside ten years and it'll
be banned. , for one, would love to invest in TAT and their PRISM system.
MOF, even if 100LL enjoys a long and fruitful life, I'd put a PRISM system
on my airplane the moment the STC is signed.

NTL, You're about oh-for-five in comprehension, on just about every aspect.

One last time: show me flight hours, not any irrelevant numbers you can pull
out of your ass without a context and you might make a small point.

You say the 70-30 ration has been falling for ten years. You've come up with
several unrelated numbers to substantiate your point, such as number of
gallons sold, which does not take into effect the effect of the fall off in
economic activity.

If you can't avoid going off on tangents, or putting round pegs in square
holes, there's no point in me following up.

In sum: you can ext
--
Matt Barrow
Performace Homes, LLC.
Colorado Springs, COract your foot from your mouth and get off your agenda
anytime.