Thread: aerobatic C172?
View Single Post
  #3  
Old May 6th 07, 12:21 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Ron Wanttaja
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 756
Default aerobatic C172?

On Sat, 5 May 2007 15:41:04 -0700, C J Campbell
wrote:

Engine mounts are good for 9 Gs. Somewhere in FAR 23, I think.

FAR 23 might not apply to a 172...it's old enough.


Certainly the 1960 model is old enough. I don't remember, but didn't
Cessna bring the new ones up to FAR 23 standards?


They may have, and it's quite possible they brought stuff like the seats to
FAR-23 to lessen liability risks. But if they were manufacturing on the old TC
they certainly didn't have to....

Ron Wanttaja