snip
Seriously, the last time I heard people complain about an "excessive
post" was when someone posted 410 THOUSAND pictures in another binaries
group.
snip

Was that "Joe Blobs" post of zillions of pics of "Hipnips" supposed faggot
boyfriends in the "older-women" newsgroup?
Or was that "mopars" blow-out in the auto group?

"Proton Fox" wrote in message
...
Joseph Testagrose wrote in
news
Sorry, my boo-boo, ment to post followup request about too many posts
to Proton Fox's last post, not to this one about McGuire AFB Air
Show. Joe.

Could we keep posts to 20 to 25 a day and not flood the group with so
many pix at the same time?

--

Hmm...so you consider 50 much reduced size photos filed under a single
topic that you don't even have to click open an excessive flood? With
all the files combined equaling under 4MB? Been using binary newsgroups
in the last decade or so? Overloading your trusty TI-99, mayhap? Run out
of paper punch cards for file storage?

Or did you like the McGuire website link post, that doesn't even include
a single sample image of any size? In which case, why are you even using
a news reader instead of a search engine? Or does the "Google" homepage
take too long to load for you?

Seriously, the last time I heard people complain about an "excessive
post" was when someone posted 410 THOUSAND pictures in another binaries
group. With my own very limited dial-up bandwidth, I can't conceive of
posting something even remotely excessive. Not even a single multi-part
file, thumbnail indexes, no yEnc, and STILL somebody's ticked off! I
guess there's no pleasing some people...so, flame on! Fight the power,
brother! If thine eye still offend thee, plonk it out!

--
"Download, download baby! Feel the love, the joy and the power!" Love &
Joy from Superstar, Heartsdales