On May 20, 2:04 pm, Thomas Borchert
wrote:
Greg,

Who is snarling?

But let's stop
with these imaginary tales.

Actually, come to think about it, I have to reverse your statement
about Newps: Your the only person I have ever met denying these
properties of the basic Mooney airframe so vehementely.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

Actually, I'm not denying the "these properties". I'm denying a
specific set of properties to which only you two seem to have
observed. Heck, the window and associated visibility complaint is so
common no other Mooney owner I've spoken too has ever even heard of it
before; yet they know the other old wife's tales. It usually gets a
laugh or a roll of the eyes when I ask about it. Yet it's so
obviously well known, only you two know about it. Heck, you might
want to try it at your next hangar mixer. You'll find it gets a good
laugh and livens things up.

In stead of providing any type of fact to prove me wrong, the sights
are now turned on me. You then seem to imply something by using the
word "vehementely". You do know what media this is right? Of
course you do. The direction a rat fart blows is vehemenently debated
here. Why would serious errors and opinions presented as fact be any
different? That's a rhetorical question.

At this point, I think we've beaten the horse. You wanna deliver the
death blow?

Cheers,

Greg