Recently, Blueskies posted:

"Martin Hotze" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 May 2007 22:27:30 GMT, kontiki wrote:

Sir... most crime victims were just going about their normal routine
and were chosen by the perpetrator because they looked like a good
"victim" who would not have a means of defense. I am not talking
about gang or drug related violence here.

So it would have been a good idea if the folks at Colombine would
have carried a gun themselves? Is that what you want to say?



Yes, and the folks on 9/11 would have had a better chance if they
also we allowed to carry...

I can only imagine a different outcome that might have suited the
intentions of terrorists even better, as it would have still killed a
large number of people *and* taken a serious bite out of air travel from
that point on.

Neil