Morgans wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
...
Morgans wrote:
And yes, the copy editor and the webmaster should have caught it, too.
The copy editor is probably the one who made the typo. The webmaster? Now
you're truly revealing your ignorance about such websites. First off,
there probably is no webmaster per se.

You know, there was a reason I had plonked you long ago, and it is coming
back to me now.

Yep. It's the fact that you can't make a coherent argument.

I really don't give a rat's ass if I know exactly how a web page works. A
mistake was made that does not reflect well on a media outlet's
professionalism.

And the fact that you cannot distinguish between a typo in a headline
and inaccurate reporting does not reflect well on your judgment.

If you can not admit to the fact that a media web site should not be making
mistakes like that, then you have very low standards, or are just arguing
for argument's sake. In either case, I see no reason to continue this any
further.

I've agreed several times that there was an error made in editing. You,
on the other hand, cannot admit to being caught drawing false
conclusions from it.

Pigs and mud and enjoyment, and all.

Subjects you probably know quite well, I imagine.