View Single Post
  #71  
Old September 11th 03, 06:40 PM
Mike Marron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John Halliwell wrote:
Mike Marron wrote:


Not to mention the Superfort's extra *4,000* total horsepower and four
humongous four-blade 17-ft. diameter props!


That brings a comparison between the B-29 and Shackleton wings/engines
into the equation I guess.


Nah, the Shackleton was a frumpy Brit post-war bomber
hopelessly outclassed by the sleek and futuristic B-29
which actually saw combat in both WW2 and Korea and
later copied by the Soviets.

If you want to compare post-war recip bomber aircraft, you'd
have to compare the Shackleton to the B-50 in which case the
Shackleton becomes even more hopelessly outclassed:

Shackleton total HP: 9,600 (B-50: 14,000)
Shackleton max speed: 287 mph (B-50: 385 mph)
Shackleton service ceiling: 22,000 ft. (B-50: 37,000 ft.)
Shackleton range: 2,500 miles (B-50: 4,650 miles)
Shackleton bombload: 18,000 lbs. (B-50: 20,000 lbs.)


-Mike Marron