AviationBanter - View Single Post

**Matt Whiting** · June 15th 07, 02:55 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student

wrote:
Jim, you don't have to do the physics for a 1 g roll. click on

stanford.edu/~sigman/one_g_roll.html for a really neat analysis.

Page down toward the end of sigman's article to see the actual flight
paths that it takes. It's a neat read.

Oh, for the nonbelievers in Newton and vector analysis and such (Mx
whatever comes to mind) don't bother.

A very nice analysis and it confirms that you can't execute a barrel
roll from straight and level flight while maintaining 1G. You either
lose a lot of altitude and end up in a steep dive or you have to pull up
(and thus exceed 1 G) if you want to end up at the starting altitude.
Case closed. :-)

Matt