On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:17:28 -0500, "Duke of URL"
macbenahATkdsiDOTnet wrote in Message-Id:
:

"M.Hamer" wrote in message


Just found someone who would rehash old speculations with the slant
the way you wanted it to go, did you?

Hmmm...sounds just like what the Americans and British did just
before we illegally invaded Iraq.

Historical revisionist f*ckhead.
flame intensity="100%"
Clot thee, the donkey you rode in on, the little dog following behind,
and the fleas jumping off his ass. Thou'rt the out-of-wedlock-begotten
offspring of a syphilitic Port Said bum-boat operator and a scrofulous
camel. I could carve a better brain out of congealed bacon grease.
Thou'rt so narrow-minded couldst see through a keyhole with both eyes.
Were I like thee, thou unmuzzled fly-bitten maggot-pie, I'd throw away
myself. Couldst find a better mind in a reliquary. Thou art a churlish
earth-vexing clotpole. Igneous rocks exert a firmer grasp upon
empirical reality than thou dost. Thy bones are hollow; thy brain is
clabbered; impiety hast made a feast of thee. My sincerest wish is thy
beslubbering mother runs out from under the porch and bites what
little thee hast left smooth off.
/flame
FLLUUUSSHHH... Away, moldy fen-sucking creamfaced loon, away!

The above ad hominem attack is a sterling example of the last resort
of a debater devoid of reasonable factual arguments: Attack the
person, not his rhetoric.

It's what would one expect of an article spammed across
soc.culture.russian, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.europe,
rec.aviation.military and sci.military.naval, I suppose.

--

Irrational beliefs ultimately lead to irrational acts.
-- Larry Dighera,