Eeyore wrote in
:



Dan Luke wrote:

"Jay Honeck" wrote:

Scientific theory is all well and good -- but things tend to get
grossly distorted when money and humans are mixed in.

So, on that basis you can wave away the scientific consensus on the
subject?

Alleged (and alleged is all it is) 'consensus' proves nothing.

I suppose you'd wave away the very well argued objections to the IPCC
case ? A convincing and scientifically sound case wouldn't need to
rely on making such claims.



Is da guv'ment, eh mate?



Sun reading scumbag



Bertie




Graham