The ethanol scam
Dan Luke wrote:
"Eeyore" wrote:
I'll probably put something about it on a site eventually.
It would be more helpful to us if you just mentioned one
or two here. By the time you have gotten around to doing
something on your site the moment will have passed and
we shall all have forgotton about it. You wouldn't want that,
would you?
I spend enough time on Usenet without typing reams of stuff to please some
one who also might forget about it in a trice.
However, here's suimple one. Let's start at the beginning. The IPCC case is
that CO2 and temperature data show anthropogenic global warming.
So, their CO2 and temperature figures are rather important to their case, no ?
Now, look in some details and you'll find that both their CO2 and
temperature numbers are based on data manipulation that is fundamentally
flawed.
No doubt you could point out those details and why they are flawed, if only
you had the time.
I would indeed.
Graham
|