On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 18:10:56 -0400, russell wrote
(in article ):

I don't think eYenc is bad.. I just can't see pictures posted in it.

So get one of the free or low-cost tools (under US$25) which will allow you
see them. Or don't. Your choice. Just know going in that whichever way you
choose, your choice will do _nothing_ to make those who post pix post using
YENC or not using YENC. What you can or can't see on USENET is entirely in
your hands.





"Clairbear" wrote in message
...
Q wrote in news:l9gla35lkhu73knfk312rq662uvk7c9lce@
4ax.com:

On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 09:57:18 +1000, the unlearned "russell"
cast a Level 65 wizard spell and wrote:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/oshkosh/

But why *would* web page photos be in yenc?

I can understand why posters would use yenc in usenet to significantly
boost post retention for people on low retention servers, or to cut
size for those outside of USA who are usually on pay per GB or GB
limited ISP accounts.


Q
please don't start with these anti-yEnc guys again
they love to argue that yEnc is bad antd they will flame you for even
telling them the facts