On Aug 29, 4:54?am, tomcervo wrote:
On Aug 28, 10:05?pm, Rob Arndt wrote:

That naval aviator had he chosen to fight would have had his arms and
legs broken- I would have made sure he wouldn't have been flying any
time soon afterwards. **** Dan, I am a big guy and worked construction
and warehouse all my life. I've dealth with real ganstas and hardcore
thugs from Folsom prison. That wimpy naval prick would have been
busted up badly had he thrown the first punch. He didn't even make a
move, the pretty boy. Being in the Navy means he probably was a queer
too and certainly didn't want to wrinkle his uniform.

You don't get it, do you.
He's a NAVAL AVIATOR, who flew the top of the line navy fighter, and
you . . . don't seem to have flown anything more than a keyboard.
You're a big guy. Big guys load the ordnance on a plane he flies at
Mach 2. Your opinion means about as much to him as that of the guy
yelling **** from the steam grate he sleeps on.

You don't get it, that naval aviator is not an entity unto himself- he
relies completely on the US taxpayer to foot the bill for his carrier,
all of its weaponry, and its entire operation. Onboard, he is part of
an operation and relies completely on the deck crews. Get some "big
guy" that ****s up his ordnance and his top of the line fighter
becomes impotent- flying scrap metal.

As far as his opinion goes, who here worships a naval aviator? These
are the same braggarts that think they are something special b/c they
can land on a carrier and put down the USAF pilots all the time.

BTW, how the **** do you know if he was flying an old F-14 or a F/A-18
or something else???

Answer that dickhead.

Rob

p.s. And if he was God-D good, then it really must be shameful that
the inexperienced Germans beat both the USN and USMC with their de-
tuned MiG-29s