On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 07:03:19 +0200, Mxsmanic
wrote:

John Kulp writes:

Completely silly, of course. It's called redunancy.

Redundancy won't help in a deliberate attempt.

Whatever this means.


Check the web. Where you'll find out that 4 engined planes aren't
anywhere near as efficient as two engined. Have much less fuel
efficient engines,, etc.

They don't have to have four engines to be big, and they are certainly not 100
times less efficient.

I never said they were. As usual, no one understands whatever point
you are trying to make here.


Uuh. that was about 40 years ago ace when it was true.

So things change.

Well, you occasionally show you have a clue about something. Not much
though.