"John R Weiss" wrote in message
news:NPLeb.649602$YN5.499281@sccrnsc01...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote...

The point being that a rudder has some tendancy to reverse in turbulance
and
I have provided you with two cases of operators panicing, when operating
under those conditions. (as determined by the administrator)

Two cases in decades and millions of flight hours hardly presents a
"general
case"!

Further, you have not shown any indication of panic on the part of any
pilot.
You noted earlier that some pilots have been TAUGHT to use a significant
amount
of rudder in circumstances such as those encountered by US 427. Such use
of
rudder would have been reaction based on training, not on panic.


BTW, I have checked the 747-400 FHB, and turn coordination is indeed a
function of the yaw damper. I had overlooked that detail, since the
spoilers
tend to assist in that same function.

Impressive Weiss, but a little late after you have been such a prick.
The
707 is a much better study in spoiler deployment for YAW cancellation
and
probably coser to the B-52H configurtion.

Late for what? Perhaps the only thing that's late is your period...

My goodness, that is a really lame lame, Weiss.

Hmmm... It appears the only thing subject to a prick is that
thin-skinned,
inflated balloon that is your ego.

In that you are clearly projecting, Weiss.

Maybe the A-6 comes even closer to current B-52 configuration for roll
control -- use of spoilers only, with no ailerons. In the case of the
A-6,
coordinated turns could be accomplished with little or no use of rudder.
However, faster roll rates -- often tactically/operationally
advantageous --
were available with rudder use.

Thank you for finally contributing some information to this thread, John.