On 7 Oct 2003 19:32:43 -0700, (lisieux) wrote:


I think the wording is its own evidence as to veracity, don't you?

The earlier British rifle was potentially a better development
product, the 5.56 round was not really the answer and neither was the
7.62 NATO.


Reading the ballistic data at the bottom makes for an interesting what if.


greg


--
$ReplyAddress =~ s#\@.*$##; # Delete everything after the '@'
The Following is a true story.....
Only the names have been changed to protect the guilty.