Mxsmanic wrote in
:

writes:

This has never been an accepted definition of angle of attack and
your creation of it has no credibility.

Ho-hum. Acceptable to whom? Credible to whom?

Decide for yourself what you will accept or believe. Don't rely on
others to do it for you. Arguments can stand or fall on their own
merit; do not rely on hearsay and peer pressure to do your thinking
for you.

You just create even more confusion in your mind and in the minds
of innocent truth-seekers here.

Compelling people to think for themselves will not confuse them, as
long as they are not unusually stupid. Most people don't like to
think for themselves, but they can do it if they have to.

So you don't believe NASA or NACA or anyone else that finds
lift at negative AOAs on some airfoils?

When I read what NASA says, it always seems to be different from what
people claim that NASA says.



Yeah, right. You have no idea what Nasa says, fjukkwit.


You don't even know how a wing works.

And you don't fly. and never will.


Bertie