Thread
:
Engine power question???
View Single Post
#
5
October 11th 07, 04:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
cavelamb himself[_4_]
external usenet poster
Posts: 474
Engine power question???
wrote:
On Oct 10, 5:10 pm, "J.Kahn" wrote:
cavelamb himself wrote:
J.Kahn wrote:
It forces you to use a certain minimum prop pitch to avoid
overspeeding it in flight.
An O-320 makes 120 hp at 2300 rpm and 26". At wide open throttle at
SL and 2250 it is probably around 130 hp. Add a couple thousand feet
and 125 hp at the start of the roll sounds about right.
Any fixed pitch airplane is the same. A 150 with a stock O200 doesn't
have 100 hp available while static either, probably more like 80-85.
So all things being equal you still have 50% more power available than
stock.
You know, we ALL really ought to go get another hour in a 150 every once
in a while.
When I was in high school, the 150 was IT! WoW!
But I flew one a couple of years ago and the prevelant thought was,
"What happened? This used to be FUN".
With all the old wives' tales about running constant speed engines
"oversquare" (rpm below mp) it's amusing to note that fixed pitch
aircraft are way oversquare all through their takeoff and climb phase
until they're going fast enough.
John
Actually, I'm starting to look for a 150 to play around with and for the
kids to learn in next spring. They fly about as well as most
airplanes, with a really good useful load for that size. The 150 does a
lot of things reasonably well and are becoming dirt cheap as the big
flight schools unload them. Where else can you get a 600 lb useful
load, electrics, really powerful fowler flaps, etc all for 20k.
Everybody else hates them, but I like the '64/65 straight tails. If
you block out the front half of the airplane in a picture, it looks like
an A-26.
Apparently aileron gap seals make the ailerons much lighter and
snappier, probably the biggest complaint in handling.
John
We're at 3000' ASL here. We found the 150 to be underpowered
and really tight inside, and the O-200 would usually give top end
problems by mid-life. There were days in the summer (30°C/85°F, 5000'
DA) when the dumb thing would climb at under 200 FPM and take all day
to reach circuit altitude. They might be OK near sea level.
The older straight tails, or at least the ones without the
back window, were lighter and faster. Not many of them around now. The
150's flaps are awesome, and the rudder has enough authority to deal
with strong crosswinds, better than the 172. And it'll spin readily,
something the 172 is really reluctant to do.
Dan
Well, that's all right, I guess.
But it's sure no 65 HP Taylorcraft.
(Which gets off shorter, climbs better and is (no ****) faster!)
Richard
cavelamb himself[_4_]
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by cavelamb himself[_4_]
Find all threads started by cavelamb himself[_4_]