"Mike Noel" wrote in message
. ..
Blocking fish that need to swim upstream to spawn, destroying upstream
habitats by submergence, forcing subsistence farmers off their land and
moving them into overcrowded and polluted cities...
--
Best Regards,
Mike

Yes, I suppose floods are not THAT bad...especially when the Feds can then
bail them out.

Enjoy your futures.


http://photoshow.comcast.net/mikenoel

A frog in a well does not know the great sea.
"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
news

"Roger (K8RI)" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:58:02 -0400, "Morgans"
wrote:


"David G. Nagel" wrote

Hydro and it's problems.

Problems? What problems? Last I checked, hydro was clean, non
polluting,
and has the advantage of helping to control floods.

Lot of ecological side effects. Good for short term flood control, but
may cause problems long term. A lot depends on the area where the dam
is located.

What sort of "problems"?