View Single Post
  #28  
Old October 16th 03, 12:04 AM
phil hunt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:34:11 -0700, Harry Andreas wrote:
In article ,
wrote:

On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 09:50:21 -0700, Harry Andreas

wrote:

Interestingly models of aircraft operated by the Malaysia and Indonesia
did not make it to the shortlist. There are a million ways to interpret
this. One of them is to avoid any hesitation by the pilots when going
head to head?

That's certainly a consideration. Plus the recognition factor when US forces
are in the area. USN a/c not likely to fire on an F-15.


They'd be well advised not to fire on a Typhoon either, since it's
better than anything the USN is likely to have for some time (and I
think the F-35C falls in that category).


Is it better than an Amraam?


Would the F-35 even get close enough to fire an AMRAAM? Meteor is
longer range, and since the Typhoon is faster it could (depending on
the tactical situation) decide whether to break contact.

--
"It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than
people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia
(My real email address would be if you added 275
to it and reversed the last two letters).