Landing fee at SJC? Are we now so far??
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
		
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 23:23:37 -0000, "Robert M. Gary" 
 wrote in 
  om: 
 
On Nov 5, 11:04 am, Larry Dighera  wrote: 
 
 As long as they abide by FAA regulations, I suppose they are within 
 their right. 
 
They can descriminate against GA by charging high fees. The FAA 
generally doesn't prohibit that. 
 
There is something immoral about using public AIP funds to construct 
an airport at which a pilot MUST pay a private corporation for the 
right to use what his tax dollars have built. 
 
 You're saying that the airport operator (SJ county?) does not permit 
 aircraft, other than the one paying tie-down fees for a specific spot, 
 to park in rented parking spots?   
 
That is very much true. The tie down is associated with the N number 
 
-Robert 
 
It would seem that the firm operating the airport is unnecessarily 
exposing itself to potential damage liabilities as a result of 
implementing that policy, but I suppose the lease agreement forces the 
lessee to give up those rights.   
 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	 |