Thread
:
Full procedure versu vectors
View Single Post
#
4
November 8th 07, 06:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Wyatt Emmerich[_2_]
external usenet poster
Posts: 8
Full procedure versu vectors
By full approach, I mean flying it as published. Usually a T approach, but
sometimes there's a hold as part of the approach. Flying the full approach
is easier with the WAAS. You don't have to input headings on the heading
bug. It is more predictable because it's published. No chance of
miscommunication on vectors. No constantly adjusting the heading bug. No
chance of the controller bringing you around to close of an automatic
glideslope couples.
--
Wyatt Emmerich
President, Emmerich Newspapers
601-977-0470
PO Box 16709, Jackson MS 39236
Shipping: 246 Briarwood Drive, Suite 101, Jackson MS 39206
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
...
"Wyatt Emmerich" wrote in message
. ..
With my 530 upgraded to WAAS, I think it's easier to fly full procedure
GPS approaches rather than take vectors.
Full procedure GPS approaches? Do you mean proceeding direct to an IAF on
a basic-T approach versus being vectored to join the FAC?
Does it complicate life for
controllers when you request the full procedure?
Not if there's no other traffic.
Wyatt Emmerich[_2_]
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Wyatt Emmerich[_2_]
Find all threads started by Wyatt Emmerich[_2_]