Thread
:
Full procedure versu vectors
View Single Post
#
11
November 8th 07, 06:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Wyatt Emmerich[_2_]
external usenet poster
Posts: 8
Full procedure versu vectors
Can you elaborate on why you feel the full precure is easier than
vectors
It is more predictable because it's published. No chance of miscommunication
on vectors. No constantly adjusting the heading bug. No chance of the
controller bringing you around too close for an automatic glideslope couple.
Vectors is very easy. But letting the GPS steering do the full approach and
autocouple the WAAS glideslope is even easier.
--
Wyatt Emmerich
President, Emmerich Newspapers
601-977-0470
PO Box 16709, Jackson MS 39236
Shipping: 246 Briarwood Drive, Suite 101, Jackson MS 39206
"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Nov 7, 11:58 am, "Wyatt Emmerich" wrote:
With my 530 upgraded to WAAS, I think it's easier to fly full procedure
GPS
approaches rather than take vectors. Does it complicate life for
controllers
when you request the full procedure? I get the feeling that they would
rather vector me on the ILS than have me shoot a GPS full approach.
I like the GPS full approach but I don't want to be irritating
controllers
and mucking up things by doing so.
Can you elaborate on why you feel the full precure is easier than
vectors?
Wyatt Emmerich[_2_]
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Wyatt Emmerich[_2_]
Find all threads started by Wyatt Emmerich[_2_]