John Meyer wrote:
In article ,
Mike Mackenzie wrote:

®i©ardo wrote (in part):

John Meyer wrote:
Although the file sizes are around 300k, a pixel dimension of only 640
makes the pictures less enjoyable. What do you think about going up to
900 pixels or larger? Thanks all the same for the Duxford photos - looks
like a great museum.

Hi John,

I've been using the smaller size because of a request originating from
one of my previous postings.

Is the attached an improvement?

Ricardo
Here's the same pic re-saved to 800 x 600 using Irfanview at 85%
resolution. It's a bit larger than yours and less than a third of
the KB, but the resolution is probably good enough for the NG.

Mike

That's the ticket: when you resize your original file for this news
group, use a larger pixel dimension and a little more compression to
keep the file size down. Here's one resized to 1195 x 800 pixels, 72
dpi, and quality (compression) set to 9 in Photoshop.



I don't remember taking that...

;-)

--
Moving things in still pictures!