View Single Post
  #2  
Old October 17th 03, 01:23 PM
phil hunt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:30:54 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

"Mike" wrote in message
...

Another point are the missions;Rafale is very versatile,
Typhoon is an interceptor.
I don't know what you or the partners of Typhoon think about it,
but at the moment,and for now 15 years,it may be more useful to have a
good
multi-purpose aircraft,than an interceptor.



This is nonsense.

Typhoon has been designed from the beginning as a multi-role
aircraft.


Yes, but it is optimised for being a fighter. An optimised bomber
would look like an A-10 or Tornado.


--
"It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than
people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia
(My real email address would be if you added 275
to it and reversed the last two letters).