On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:04:21 -0500, tscottme wrote:
phil hunt wrote in message
...

In that case, I don't think the Syrians are acting outside their
natural rights. The way I see it, every country has a right to
decide for itself what sorts of written material it shall be legal
to print in that country.

Proving that you will excuse any action by non-Americans and criticize
any American action.

I suggest you go back and read my post again, since you obviously
didn't understand it. I was making an argument that countries have a
right to do (within pretty broad limits) what they like in their own
countries; my argument applies equally to Syria, the USA, and every
other couintry in the world. Are you too stupid to understand that?
Or os it just that anything that you disagree with brings up the
automatic knee-jerk response, "Anit-American"?

You didn't know what super notes were but in a
couple of hours you've rationalized sophisticated counterfeiting.

Are you saying counterfeiting is inherently wrong, then?

Thank
G-d they don't embrace bestiality, officially.

If they did, it would be their own business. I'd have no problem
with a country making sex acts between humans and animals legal;
indeed in the country I live in, some such acts are legal.

--
"It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than
people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia
(My real email address would be if you added 275
to it and reversed the last two letters).