It's clear you misread the code as well -- or perhaps you have never
read it (and of course it is not published as a joiurnal, but it also
is subject to peer review). In my profession we need more than a
casual knowledge of those chapters.

The other truth is, you probably hold more copyrights than I do --
5800 of them for this newsgroup alone. Those writings, however, are
not peer reviewed because I think most here would be insulted to be
called your peer.

As to the relative worth of our writings? To quote another frequent
poster, Bertie:

"hahahahahahhahahahahahahahahha"

Sorry, casual reader, if you inhaled coffee.





On Nov 18, 11:01 am, Mxsmanic wrote:
Tina writes:
I mostly publish in the professional literature, but choose to not
offer a CV here. There's ample evidence you have difficulty
understanding even fairly simple writings based on opinions you've
expressed here, so the bet to make is you'd really misrepresent what
you might read in peer reviewed journals.

The U.S. Code isn't a peer-reviewed journal.