I don't know the technical terms but this is what it looks like to me: when
I see the image in Outlook Express it's smaller (27x15 cm or so) because I
have the folders column on the left hand side of the screen. If I open it
then I get a full screen image of about 33x22 cms). Going to the Warbirdz
site it opens as a 32 x 20 cm image. The Warbirdz image is the better of
the three from a viewer's perspective. Does the dpi change? I dunno. I
just know what looks good. Maybe the key is that on thw Warbirdz site it's
a largepic and for the newsgroup it's downsized to save bandwidth.
That's why we visit both locations. Show us a good photo in the newsgroup
and we know it's better on Warbirdz.
It's not something that jumps out to people. You are trying to make us
think.......
Regards from Pensacola, Tom

"Richard Connell" wrote in message
...
The attachment size is 116k, but the size of the image on the website is
76k. I can't distinguish the difference visually.

Richard

"Glenn" wrote in message
...
http://www.warbirdz.net/largepic.php?ID=12327

The above link, when you view it, does it look identical to the image
below.
reason why I ask is on my monitor, the link above is obviously compressed
but the image below
is the same image, just not uploaded onto my website. The image i post
below, looks good and the compression is nowhere near as evident.

Yet it is the same image.
Is this glaringly obvious to you guys as well.