wrote in
:

On Nov 30, 9:28 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote
innews:810f1cd3-25b4-47b0-9646-42954b6d2385
@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.c
om:





On Nov 29, 8:04 pm, Rich Ahrens wrote:
Gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
house.com...

"No way am I buying any aeroplane built by them heathen
Chinee..."

F'ck the Chinese. I don't care if people call it xenophobic.
They're environment-trashing, human-rights-violating,
child-abandoning, dissident-imprisoning communists who sell
weapons to our enemies and block their population from accessing
the truth about the world and their government.

Sound like ideal allies and trading partners then - certainly we
have or have had plenty of other allies guilty of all the above.

Xenophobic? What are the chances of the Dalai Lama dropping in
to watch the Olympics without disappearing?

It's not phobic to say that China is our ideological enemy. But
I -could- be phobic, because anybody who has nuclear weapons
pointed at my home or tries to steal our military technology is
my enemy.

Thank you for demonstrating my point.

You have no point. Gatt is 100% correct. Placating the Chinese
with trade won't last. Eventually, they will exercise their
military. I am expecting them to invade Siberia in an effort to
expand their territory and gain access to more natural resources.
How do you say "Liebensraum" in Chinese?

Well, you say it as Lebensraum in German, for starters.

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Thanks for the spelling check...


Actually, the difference is one in philosophy rather than speeeliing.

Since you're grasp of reality seems slender at best I naturally assumed
you thoguth the Germans were looking for love in WW2


Perhaps they were..



Bertie