"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
John Mazor writes:

Then they must get a lot of cases that go to court because that's bad science.

They get a lot of cases because some people still cannot prevent themselves
from drinking and driving. Those people often go to jail. There's nothing
wrong with the science.

If the law will convict anyone on 0.01% BAC then the law is a ass.

You can get a non-zero reading without consuming alcohol, even with
lab-grade equipment.

All you have to do is prove that it's not alcohol.

1. One kind of false positive doesn't involve ingestible alcohol.
2. And "consuming" is a clue to a second source of false positives.

That's why the FAA allows up to a .02% BAC reading before flying.

It should be zero.

Nope. That would be bad science.