Tina wrote in news:ffe1625f-3791-4bad-8f88-
:

Bertie, the professional literature in the 60s was forming a consensus
for global cooling.

Predictions change as observations and science improves.





I wouldn't be exactly what you might call "new" to this argument, but if we
get started on it here this group will become a subdivision of
alt.global.warming, a ski chalet for alt.usenet kooks and a toilet for teh
meowers.
Trust me here. I know of whence I speak.

I like arguing this one in different venues than this, but usually don't
use the bunyip handle much whilst doing so.

Anyhow, here's one of the better explanations out there of what I meant and
this guy says it so much better than I ever could anyway.. .

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php...turated-gassy-
argument/


At the end of the day I might be wrong, but here's a question for you;
If you were to point a gun to your head which you thought was empty and I
were to point out to you that I might see a glimmer of a slug in the
chamber, do you think you might have a look in the chamber before you
pulled the trigger based on my say-so?


Bertie