"Daryl Hunt" wrote in message ...
"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
k.net...
In article ,
says...

"Michael" wrote in message
om...

snip

Okay, so the only basis of your arguement is a 50+ year old memory
from when you were a child? Well, I guess there's no way in the world
facts can beat that.

Facts are made up of many things. A 50 year old memory is also fact.

No it's not. In this case, it's nothing more than a vague
recollection.

History, as written, 50 years later may not be the correct one. History
is
written by the winners.

And this applies to this discussion how? The "winners" (who would
that be BTW?) have written the P-38 out of 50s USAF and Korean War
history?

A 50 year old memory is nothing more than that.

However research in the records has show you to be incorrect.

Several times in this thread already.

What the records have shown is that there is many records that don't quite
agree. They disagree by a couple of years or so.

No they don't. Everything points to the P-38 being gone from USAF and
ANG service by '49, and you've offered up nothing more than a
childhood memory as evidence that this is incorrect.

~Michael