wrote:
On Dec 6, 4:49 am, Matt Whiting wrote:
The only way the system would have worked in this case would
be if the judge had thrown out the award and then jailed the lawyer for
wasting the court's time.

Matt

Since the jury ruled in the plaintiff's favor (as did the judge when
he still left $600,000+ in her favor), I assume you mean the
defendant's lawyer.

No, I meant the plaintiff's lawyer ... and you knew that.