On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 18:12:15 +0100, ess (phil hunt)
wrote:


Oh yes you were, your elaborately constructed 2nd fallacy was clearly
drawing an equivalence between the two.

Ah -- I think I understand you now. You seem to think that I'm
trying to use logic to "trap" you into disagreeing with some of your
beliefs.

I don't have to 'seem' to do anything, your use of the yes/no debating
tactics made it quite clear.

You also, subconsciously, don't think your beleifs would
stand up to the scrutiny of debaste being cast on them -- probably
you have low self esteem

Oh lovely, a usenet psychoanalyst.

, at least in your intellectual abilities --
so a defense mechanism kicks in and you evade the issue.


I haven't evaded anything, I have pointed out the clear flaws in your
rhetoric.


Oh, BTW, a question isn't a fallacy.

Oh yes it is, when they make clear use of prejudicial language and false
presumption.



greg







--
$ReplyAddress =~ s#\@.*$##; # Delete everything after the '@'
The Following is a true story.....
Only the names have been changed to protect the guilty.