On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 11:12:59 +0100, Greg Hennessy wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 03:04:32 +0100, ess (phil hunt)
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:46:10 +0100, Greg Hennessy wrote:

I haven't evaded anything, I have pointed out the clear flaws in your
rhetoric.

Oh for ****s sake! It wasn't rhetoric, it was inquisition[1].

One example of many.

" is it OK for someone to donate a few million pounds to a
politician?"

Clearly a rhetorical question.

A rhetorical question is one that isn't looking for an answer. I
clearly was looking for an answer to the questions I asked, so they
weren't rhetorical.

Are
you always this defensive? In real life, do you assume anyone you're
having a conversation with is out to get you?

Hmmm I wonder why you felt the need to tell me that.

To get you to realise how you come across (at least to me).

--
"It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than
people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia
(Email: , but first subtract 275 and reverse
the last two letters).