Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Airbus writes:

Trying to read between the lines of this incredibly weird post, it
would appear the writer is suffering from the illusion that
"fractional" airspace altitudes in a given segment are indicated both
for the charted (Class B) airspace and for the underlying (Class E).

Even a very quick glance at the chart will show that airspace limits
are given as one number over another, separated by a horizontal line.
The top number is the upper limit, the bottom is the lower, in units
of 100 feet. Since this vertical positioning is not technically
possible in running text, I used a slash in place of the horizontal
line. Nothing weird about that.


Wrong again, fukkwit.

Readers should be advised of the fact that this
expert, offering his "presumptions" may never have seen a sectional
chart, and certainly has never studied the subject - does not know
how to read the chart.

I've seen lots of sectional charts and I've become pretty good at
reading them.


No, you haven't.


You have to fly to read them, fjukkwit.

It's like saying you read music without playing any instrument.
Completely pointless and totally inaccurate.


Bertie