On Dec 23, 12:22 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote in news:8b969aa1-b7d9-4f71-b26b-
:


On Dec 22, 4:02 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote in news:7a965ed2-3abb-4b38-a61e-
:

On Dec 21, 2:40 pm, Gig601XLBuilder wrote:
BradGuthwrote:

FYI: the Moon is not actually BLUE, except to the unfiltered eye.

Well if I put the right filter on the camera my **** can be pink.

Are you saying that China and Japan had each put blue bandpass filters
on their color cameras?
-BradGuth-

Why, do they **** pink?

Thanks for proving the obvious, that Yids of a feather flock
together.

Does this mean I have to get circumcised?

Bertie

If that's what it takes for the likes of yourself to tell us why
nothing of our NASA/Apollo ever managed to look the least bit bluish
(pretty damn neat Kodak film trick with such unfiltered cameras), and
as to why the albedo vibrance of Venus was never once within sight
from any EVA or orbital FOV.

BTW, our moon's albedo on average is physically dark as an open pit
coal mine. Go figure upon which other nearly white guano moon as
having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated, that our rad-hard
Apollo wizards landed upon, instead of the reactive naked surface of
iron, cobalt, sodium and titanium of such a dry and dusty moon that's
so physically dark and as such unavoidably gamma and X-ray anticathode
nasty.
- Brad Guth