On Dec 26, 2:06 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote :



On Dec 25, 5:06 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote

om:

Those NASA/Apollo folks were simply a whole lot smarter than given
credit, especially those Third Reich of the Semitic kind.

Even if having such a reliable fly-by-rocket lander (of which our
Apollo wizards did not have); would you have taken those moonsuit
naked EVA walks upon such a gamma saturated moon that's at least 8
fold worse off in secondary/recoil X-rays than any nasty Van Allen
belt?

You bet I would.

Bertie

And that's either because you had yourself an actual fly-by-rocket
lander (though of undocumented prototype R&D) as of 4 decades ago and
oddly not doable as of today, and/or is this naked moon walkabout
possible because of your superior rad-hard DNA?

Remember that you folks can't even tell us why the NASA/Apollo moon
wasn't the least bit physically dark or much less looking blue, not to
mention your not knowing of where or how the hell Venus was hiding.

I could but since you're a k00k you wouldn't listen anyway.

Bertie

In other words, you claim to know the truth but have elected as to not
share and share alike. Figures, doesn't it.

As having said this before; Our blue moon as having been recently
color CCD imaged with quality bandpass coated optics is in fact
looking rather bluish, pretty much as it should appear to those
insufficiently filtered cameras.

BTW, our moon's albedo on average of 0.11 is nearly as physically dark
as an open pit coal mine. Go figure upon which other nearly white
guano moon as having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated that our
rad-hard Apollo wizards landed upon, instead of the unavoidably
reactive naked surface of iron, cobalt, sodium and titanium worth of
such a dry and extremely dusty moon that's so physically dark and as
such representing that unavoidably gamma and X-ray anticathode nasty
environment in addition to its naked basalt surface as being so
unavoidably electrostatic charged.

- Brad Guth