View Single Post
  #4  
Old December 28th 07, 11:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Ralph Jones[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 117
Default soaring into the future

On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 20:45:32 GMT, Eric Greenwell
wrote:

Frank Whiteley wrote:

You will get much less objection to establishing a new gliderport with
a winch than a tow plane. Land can also be mixed use, and leased,
rather than purchased. Local regulations can be problematic or not.
If you are in a club, you will likely get more objection from your
geezer members to setting up a winch only club than you will from
neighbors.


I'd like to ask a favor of everyone: let's find a more accurate and less
prejudicial term than "geezer" for people that don't want change or
reflexively favor aerotow. It's gratuitous, and disparagement apparently
based on age isn't going to win any of the friends we'll need to improve
soaring. It may also blind people to the fact that a lot of us "geezers"
support smaller, simpler, lighter, and cheaper soaring.

Maybe "reflexive aerotow promoters", "anti-change group", or
"short-sighted club officers"?

Or even skip the label entirely. The above statement could have used
"some members" just as effectively as "geezer", especially since the
poster was just speculating.


My definition of "geezer" is "pilot who has more hours on fire than I
have on actual instruments." An honorable title.

rj