"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...

I think it is relevant.


You're free to think that, but it's still irrelevant.



If you had flown for one of the military services, a
lot of the things we're talking to you about would be things that you'd
experienced. Maybe it never occurred to you, never having experienced it,
that
military flight manuals are constantly being updated as new information
regarding the aircraft is received, either from the manufacturer or from
the
field.


Updated with new information from the field? How can that be? You've taken
the position that the manufacturer's theories trump actual experience from
the field.



I flew I don't remember how many different kinds of aircraft, and I knew
how to ditch every one of them, and I learned how best to do it from
constant
study of the flight manuals, which provided me with the most current data
available I needed in order to make good decisions.

I flew about 4,000 hours in my military career. I never ditched an
airplane,
never bailed out of one, and walked away from every landing without even a
slight limp. Those are my credentials. There are guys who frequent this
NG
with a helluva lot more than that, and they have my attention and respect.
I
doubt that you're one of them.


I think if you review your messages in this thread a few days from now
you'll see that you've taken a completely illogical position.