Morgans schrieb:
"James Sleeman" wrote

The US Government has consistently proclaimed that these are not
Prisoners of War.

Right. They are fighting in a war that is being fought by an arm without
the support a government. They are our enemies, all the same, and they
were fighting, thus they are called enemy combatants.

In which cave have you lived that you have missed all the reports about
innocent people there (and all other disgusting stuff)?

If they would do so, it wouldn't be half the problem it is for the US now,
except of course, they wouldn't be able to torture the prisoners any more.

Not true. Since they are not in an army supported by a country that signed
the Geneva Convention, they have no protection.

come on! don't come with international treaties! not you as an American.
The USA must accept authority of the international court first - then,
only then you *might* have a say.

The way the cowards continue to blow up our soldiers and civilian support

What would you do if some foreign troops (without declaring war or
anything else international recognised) comes to your place and demand
that they have every say and that you are nothing but a ****ing
nonbeliever (and worser things)? Can you seriously come up with some
arguments what YOU would do?

people with suicide bombs, they deserve no protection, either. The fact
that they are still kept alive is more than they deserve.

No wonder they love you so much.

#m